"The Adventures of Robin Hood"
Directed by Michael Curtiz and William Keighley.
Written by Norman Reilly Raine and Seton I. Miller.
Starring Errol Flynn, Basil Rathbone and Claude Rains.
Release Year: 1938
Review Date: 8/26/03
You are right, this is FAR from new...but,
a) I hadn’t seen it, and b) it was in theaters here in San Francisco
this week, so I gotta review it!
“The Adventures of Robin Hood”, the 1938
tour de force featuring the greatest of movie swordsmen, Errol
Flynn, is great in the way that films USED to be great--a sense of
place with the hammy performances of many of the film’s actors, a
sweeping musical score, plenty of action, a dame, and an ending that
just...well, ends, like they used to before the Drawn-Out Fifteen
Minute Ending starting to take over many Hollywood productions
sometime in the mid-80s. The story is exactly what you would think,
and of course, it’s up to Sir Robin of Locksley (Flynn) to take gold
from evil Prince John (Claude Rains) and give it back to the poor
Saxons that are being oppressed because King Richard (Ian Hunter)
is, well, a bit out-of-pocket, if you will!
This is my first Errol Flynn film, and in
every way the swashbuckling legend delivers the goods. Flynn just
plays up the charm in every frame; scenes where he would just use
his eyes to convey his mischievousness were hilarious, and one can
see why the man never was noted for his acting skills. He does,
however, have the “je ne sais quoi” of a major film star--guys like
his ability to handle a sword; ladies just love that famous smile.
He carries “Robin Hood” like a beast, giving every scene he is in a
little something extra, that little something that directors
probably tried to evoke out of him but really just waited to see
come out during a take naturally. In working with his frequent
romantic co-star Olivia de Havilland (apparently, they did eight
films together; nobody does that any more!) as Maid Marion, the
twosome are fun to watch. Flynn’s sword-handling is unquestioned,
and in the film’s best action sequence during a swordfight with
rival Sir Guy (Basil Rathbone), Flynn shows off some pretty good
moves and the cinematics of the way this scene is shot are very cool
indeed. I also love when guys don’t have stunt doubles, and it
looked like Flynn was doing most of his stunts in the film. Oh, we
like that a lot!
My only problems with “Robin Hood” come from
the ridiculous performances by the other members of Robin’s team of
bandits; namely, you have your requisite roles with Friar Tuck,
Little John and a guy named Will, whose main purpose in life is to
play the guitar. All of them, plus various members of Robin’s jolly
gang, don’t have much to do and they are mostly played as
throwaways, which makes watching those scenes fairly tough. When
Little John and Robin meet for the first time (once again as both
are trying to cross a log suspended over a pond), Will goes to a
perch nearby and just starts playing the guitar while looking like
he is trying to put on a fake smile for 15 minutes...and, it just
comes off as the cheesiest shit ever. You almost expect him to
start dancing, but thankfully he doesn’t; that kind of stuff could
destroy a lesser film.
But, this is “Robin Hood” we’re talking
about! Flynn saves the day and this one was a great time.
Rating: $9.50 Show
Comments? Drop me a line at
Bellview Rating System:
"Opening Weekend": This is
the highest rating a movie can receive. Reserved for movies that
exhibit the highest level of acting, plot, character development,
setting...or Salma Hayek. Not necessarily in that order.
"$X.XX Show": This price
changes each year due to the inflation of movie prices; currently,
it is the $9.50 Show. While not technically perfect, this is a
movie that will still entertain you at a very high level.
"Undercover Brother" falls into this category; it's no "Casablanca",
but you'll have a great time watching. The $9.50 Show won't win any
Oscars, but you'll be quoting lines from the thing for ages (see
"Matinee": An average movie
that merits no more than a $6.50 viewing at your local theater.
Seeing it for less than $9.50 will make you feel a lot better about
yourself. A movie like "Blue Crush" fits this category; you leave
the theater saying "That wasn't too bad...man, did you see that
Lakers game last night?"
"Rental": This rating
indicates a movie that you see in the previews and say to your
friend, "I'll be sure to miss that one." Mostly forgettable, you
couldn't lose too much by going to Hollywood Video and paying $3 to
watch it with your sig other, but you would only do that if the
video store was out of copies of "Ronin." If you can, see this
movie for free. This is what your TV Guide would give "one and a
"Hard Vice": This rating is
the bottom of the barrel. A movie that only six other human beings
have witnessed, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. A Shannon
Tweed "thriller," it is so bad as to be funny during almost every
one of its 84 minutes, and includes the worst ending ever put into a
movie. Marginally worse than "Cabin Boy", "The Avengers" or
"Leonard, Part 6", this rating means that you should avoid this
movie at all costs, or no costs, EVEN IF YOU CAN SEE IT FOR FREE!
(Warning: strong profanity will be used in all reviews of "Hard